Gypsy moths (check this link for lots of info on history, life cycles, the State spraying program, etc). Most people who live in a wooded area in the Northeastern United States knows how 'inconvenient' <intentional understatement for effect> this pest is. The munching sounds, the poop, the effect on the trees...aarrgghh, make it stop! I am probably one of the most squeemish of people when it comes to gross stuff and have declared publicly how 'skeeved out' I was when I found out what that brown stuff was on my car last summer (and I still haven't lived that statement down, let me tell you, people love to hear about your weaknesses :-) ), so you may be surprised at what I have to say.
I attended the Monroe County Vector Control Gypsy Moth Meeting on August 8, 2007, to hear what I hoped to hear which is what the plan is to eradicate the gypsy moth which is eating all of our oak trees and making our outdoor living spaces unpleasant for part of the season. The meeting was very poorly attended, considering the emotional responses one hears at the height of caterpillar season, with about 30 people sitting in the big auditorium at Pocono Mountain East High School. Besides these few members of the public, the meeting was also attended by Tim Murasco from the Bureau of Forestry, Jacquelyn Hakim from Monroe County Vector Control, County Commissioners Nothstein and Asure, and State Representative Scavello. The bottom line is that the Townships need to apply for the State Program through the County by October 1 and that residents who wish to contact their Township Supervisors to express their wishes in this regard are urged to to so.
Mr. Murasco was the first to speak, stating that 'the Poconos is one of the most defoliated areas in the county - ever!', and that we need to pray for a wet spring to help in any eradication effort...dry conditions are the gypsy moths' friend. He explained that there are 29 counties in the state that may ask for help with spraying this year and that the State has increased the budget for such efforts to $3M, which could easily be spent in one county in a thorough eradication effort.
However, he also stated that the caterpillars are headed toward a 'natural' thinning out process due to a fungus that is affecting the colony. Ms. Hakim from Vector Control agrees with this assessment, citing the cycle we saw from 1991-2005 which illustrated the natural ebb and flow of the size and scope of the caterpillar infestation. She went so far as to say the 'prudent, scientific, unpopular but correct procedure is no spraying' <audible gasp>. Did I mention that the people who attended the meeting were, for the most part, those who were hit extremely hard this year? I have to give this lady credit...to say this in front of that audience was very brave!
Why should we NOT spray? 1) Evidence of natural pathogens is present, and 2) One spray will not do the job properly and there is not enough money to spray twice. Because of the severity of infestation and the size of the area needing treatment, we will spend the money to spray (one time) and STILL have a problem. She feels it is a waste of resources to attempt to spray at all.
Of course, most of the people in the meeting were not happy to hear her assessment of the situation. Representative Scavello was one who stood up to voice his concern and stated that he would be very disappointed if the County did not take advantage of the State's increase of this budget item because he was the one who convinced the legislature that it needed to be done.
I am writing today to take my position on the side of the scientists at the Bureau of Foresty and County Vector Control. We need a long term solution to this problem, not a short term wasting of tax dollars just to make ourselves feel better. Blasting the pests with lethal spray goes a long way emotionally, but is this really the solution for the long run? As an organic gardener, I must side with the reasoning that eventually our forest will build up its own natural immunity, so to speak, to these pests by adapting the types of food available for them...the oaks that the caterpillars prefer will be replaced by species which aren't so palatable. Natural predators of the gypsy moth, like certain types of flies, mice and wasps, will increase in numbers to meet the supply of food. Complete eradication of the species would be nice (since it is not a native species) but I don't believe this is possible. So, therefore, I must put my money on the idea that nature will balance itself out. But we need to allow it the time to do that. This is not to say that individual property owners should not take steps to protect their investments, but as a forest management plan, I believe we need to listen to our scientists.
Do you agree or disagree? Click on the comment button below and tell us why!
Recent Comments